Stay informed! Visit the SA Department of Health's website for COVID-19 updates: www.sacoronavirus.co.za

Social Media Screening vitally important as billions use platforms daily

Social media has changed the way we communicate and interact with others, on both an individual and organisational level. From staying connected and keeping up with the latest news, to searching for jobs and engaging with brands, social media has become the channel of choice for most of the world.

Social media has changed the way we communicate and interact with others, on both an individual and organisational level. From staying connected and keeping up with the latest news, to searching for jobs and engaging with brands, social media has become the channel of choice for most of the world.

 

The global COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the use of digital media for communication, and social media usage has also increased exponentially. According to statistics agency Statista, almost 4 billion people currently use social media – nearly half the world’s population – and they’re spending 2.5 hours a day doing so.

 

“This increased usage means that companies and recruiters now have another aspect to consider when screening potential candidates for positions within their organisations,” says Jennifer Barkhuizen, Head of Communications at Managed Integrity Evaluation (MIE). “Using social media screening, companies can now assess an individual’s online behaviour to better understand who they are, and the potential impact they may have in an organisation.”

 

MIE has partnered with a trusted and reliable company to supply validated, credible and accurate social media screening. Public domain information is accessed, and the data is then sorted into positive, negative and neutral content using AI and machine learning. This un-biased scoring methodology identifies red flags as well as hidden skills and talents, while establishing values and culture matches.

 

MIE’s 10th annual Background Screening Index released earlier this year showed some interesting statistics around social media screening. Over 47% of all negative content was found to be of a discriminatory nature, such as racism, sexism, homophobia, religious discrimination, and potential hate speech. Almost 32% was found to contain content of an unprofessional nature, such as profanity, aggression, sexual images or potential defamation, and close to 20% was found to demonstrate drug use or distribution. Just over 11% of negative content found related to misinformation relating to COVID-19. The highest-ranking social media platform for negative content was Facebook at just under 46%, with just under 43% found on Twitter.

 

These statistics show that social media screening is a necessity for any business. “Recruiters can identify high quality candidates quicker, reducing the time and costs associated with filling a position,” explains Barkhuizen. “Potential high-risk employees can also be identified, and in so doing help protect brand reputation and reduce company legal liability. Potential high performing individuals within the organisation can also be identified, thus aiding talent planning.”

 

Barkhuizen says that it is also important to note that government has tabled an amendment to the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act. “This aims to provide greater protection to people who challenge unfair discrimination or who are victims of hate crimes,” she says. “One of the provisions will also empower constitutional institutions to request information from the state or even private companies on measures that they have taken to combat unfair discrimination and to promote equality.”

 

Making use of social media and digital screening can therefore play a major role in combating unfair discrimination and promoting equality within the workplace. Pre-employment screening highlights red-flag behaviour before an individual is hired, and post-employment screening highlights potential discriminatory behaviour of existing employees, providing the opportunity for remedial action.

 

“These important preventative measures would – in the event of a court case – provide proof of an organisation’s efforts to combat unfair discrimination, thereby promoting an equal and inclusive work environment,” concludes Barkhuizen.



comments powered by Disqus